JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 9, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Hilene Anyelith Bahamon Florez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se levanta la suspensión de términos en el proceso de la referencia y se dispone que una vez ejecutoriada esta decisión, se contabilicen nuevamente los términos procesales a partir de la etapa en que se encontraba al momento de la suspensión.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. LEVANTAR la suspension de terminos en el proceso de la referencia, identificado con el numero de expediente D-12383 y correspondiente a la demanda formulada contra el articulo 242 (parcial) del Codigo Sustantivo del Trabajo modificado por el articulo 9o del Decreto 13 de 1967. En consecuencia, ejecutoriada esta decision se contabilizaran nuevamente los terminos procesales, a partir del momento en que se encontraban al momento de la suspension.
  2. SEGUNDO. SOLICITAR a la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion que notifique el presente proveido en el estado de esa dependencia y que, del mismo modo, se ponga en conocimiento de la ciudadania en la pagina Web de la Corte. Igualmente, comunique el contenido de esta decision al Presidente de la Republica, al Presidente del Congreso y al Procurador General de la Nacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela